Mali’s government has formally addressed the U.S. decision to revoke a $14 million grant (approximately 8.8 billion FCFA) originally allocated to support social cohesion and peacebuilding efforts within the country. The grant, which had been intended to bolster the country’s initiatives in fostering national unity and stability, was rescinded by the U.S. Department of Government Effectiveness (DOGE) following concerns over the proper use of the funds.
In a statement broadcast on state-owned television on Monday, Mali’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation criticized the U.S. move, labeling it an attempt to use development aid as leverage for political influence. The ministry underscored Mali’s rejection of any external interference that could destabilize the nation’s sovereignty and democratic processes.
Furthermore, the Malian government rejected the allegations that the U.S. aid was being mismanaged or used to exacerbate violence in the region. Officials reaffirmed the country’s commitment to maintaining peace, security, and promoting the welfare of its people, in line with the goals outlined in national development plans.
This decision to cut aid is part of a broader shift in U.S. foreign policy, initiated under the Trump administration, which has involved reducing or cutting assistance to several countries, citing concerns about potential mismanagement of funds and suspicions of government links to extremist groups.
Mali, which has faced ongoing security challenges, including armed insurgencies and extremist activities, continues to face a volatile security landscape. The government has voiced its determination to push forward with efforts to stabilize the country despite external pressures, focusing on local and regional collaborations to improve peace and social cohesion.
This move is expected to strain the already tense relationship between Mali and Western powers, particularly the U.S., as the country navigates its political, social, and economic recovery amid heightened security risks and international scrutiny.
