Bamako, Mali – The Malian High Authority for Communication (HAC) has introduced new media royalty rates that require outlets to pay between 1 million and 20 million CFA francs based on their commercial status. The measure, which was implemented without prior consultation with media professionals, has ignited widespread opposition across the country.
The new decree has drawn sharp criticism from organizations such as the Association of Online Press Professionals (APPM), who argue that the financial demands are excessive and threaten the survival of smaller media outlets. Many media groups have warned that the steep fees could force them to shut down, exacerbating the challenges of an already struggling industry.
The new rates, intended to regulate and fund the media sector, are seen by critics as an economic burden that could stifle independent journalism in the country. Journalists and media professionals have expressed their concerns over the lack of consultation before the new policy was implemented. Many argue that such significant decisions should be made with input from the industry’s key stakeholders to ensure their sustainability.
A major point of contention is the potential threat these financial burdens pose to press freedom in Mali. Critics fear that the pressure of paying high fees could lead to an erosion of editorial independence, leaving media outlets vulnerable to political and governmental influence. These concerns are particularly poignant in a country where media independence has faced significant challenges in recent years.
Despite the strong backlash from media groups, the HAC has yet to respond to calls for the immediate suspension of the decree or the reconsideration of the new fee structure. Associations continue to mobilize and raise awareness, urging the Malian government to reconsider the proposed media royalty rates before their full enforcement causes further disruption to the press sector.
The future of Mali’s media landscape remains uncertain as the controversy over these new financial regulations continues to unfold. Journalists and media associations continue to call for a dialogue with the government to reach a more sustainable and fair solution for all parties involved.
